|
No matter how good the intentions of the author of this petition and those who forward it, MADD does devote time and resources to responding to the petition that could be better spent on its real mission.
Are email petitions ever an effective tool of political change? The Urban Legend Zeitgeist would have to say, no, by themself they are a waste of perfectly good electrons.
How does a politician judge communication from constituents? Here's what one politician, Senator Dick Durbin (Democrat, Illinois), says:
"The most powerful form of communication from
constituents is the face-to-face comment. Then it's a
personal letter or phone call. After that is a huge dropoff to preprinted
postcards, and well below that is the paper petition."
As you can see, email petitions don't figure in Durbin's list.
Durbin's scale of political importance of communication is graduated by the effort put into communication. The more effort a constituent puts into communication, the more importance a politician attaches to it. Forwarding an email petition rates well below paper petitions on the effort scale.
There is another political axiom in play here: all politics is local. Why should a politician care about a petition, email or paper, that is signed by a people that don't vote in his or her district?
|