The AFU and Urban Legend Archive
Science
no math nobel




Newsgroups: sci.math,alt.folklore.urban
From: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Alex Lopez-Ortiz)
Subject: Re: a new twist on "No Nobel in mathematics"?
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 23:28:32 GMT

Archive-Name: sci-math-faq/nobel
Last-modified: December 8, 1994
Version: 6.2

Why is there no Nobel in mathematics?

Nobel prizes were created by the will of Alfred Nobel, a notable Swedish chemist.

One of the most common -and unfounded- reasons as to why Nobel decided against a Nobel prize in math is that [a woman he proposed to/his wife/his mistress] [rejected him because of/cheated him with] a famous mathematician. Gosta Mittag-Leffler is often claimed to be the guilty party.

There is no historical evidence to support the story.

For one, Mr. Nobel was never married.

There are more credible reasons as to why there is no Nobel prize in math. Chiefly among them is simply the fact he didn't care much for mathematics, and that it was not considered a practical science from which humanity could benefit (a chief purpose for creating the Nobel Foundation).

Further, at the time there existed already a well known Scandinavian prize for mathematicians. If Nobel knew about this prize he may have felt less compelled to add a competing prize for mathematicians in his will.

     [...] As professor ordinarius in Stockholm, Mittag-Leffler began a
     30-year career of vigorous mathematical activity. In 1882 he founded
     the Acta Mathematica, which a century later is still one of the
     world's leading mathematical journals. Through his influence in
     Stockholm he persuaded King Oscar II to endow prize competitions and
     honor various distinguished mathematicians all over Europe. Hermite,
     Bertrand, Weierstrass, and Poincare were among those honored by the
     King. [...]

Source: "The Mathematics of Sonya Kovalevskaya" by Roger Cooke (Springer-Verlag, New York etc., 1984, II.5.2, p. 90-91:

Here are some relevant facts:

     Although it is not known how those in responsible positions at the
     Hogskola came to believe that a large bequest was forthcoming, this
     indeed was the expectation, and the disappointment was keen when it
     was announced early in 1897 that the Hogskola had been left out of
     Nobel's final will in 1895. Recriminations followed, with both
     Pettersson and Arrhenius [academic rivals of Mittag-Leffler in the
     administration of the Hogskola] letting it be known that Nobel's
     dislike for Mittag-Leffler had brought about what Pettersson termed
     the `Nobel Flop'. This is only of interest because it may have
     contributed to the myth that Nobel had planned to institute a prize
     in mathematics but had refrained because of his antipathy to
     Mittag-Leffler or -in another version of the same story- because of
     their rivalry for the affections of a woman....
       However, Sister Mary Thomas a Kempis discovered a letter by R. C.
       Archibald in the archives of Brown University and discussed its
       contents in "The Mathematics Teacher" (1966, pp.667-668).
       Archibald had visited Mittag-Leffler and, on his report, it would
       seem that M-L *believed* that the absence of a Nobel Prize in
       mathematics was due to an estrangement between the two men. (This
       at least is the natural reading, but not the only possible one.)

     * A final speculation concerning the psychological element. Would
       Nobel, sitting down to draw up his testament, presumably in a mood
       of great benevolence to mankind, have allowed a mere personal
       grudge to distort his idealistic plans for the monument he would
       leave behind?

Nobel, an inventor and industrialist, did not create a prize in mathematics simply because he was not particularly interested in mathematics or theoretical science. His will speaks of prizes for those ``inventions or discoveries'' of greatest practical benefit to mankind. (Probably as a result of this language, the physics prize has been awarded for experimental work much more often than for advances in theory.)

However, the story of some rivalry over a woman is obviously much more amusing, and that's why it will probably continue to be repeated.

References

Mathematical Intelligencer, vol. 7 (3), 1985, p. 74.

The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution. Elisabeth Crawford. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984.


alopez-o@barrow.uwaterloo.ca
Tue Apr 04 17:26:57 EDT 1995

--

Alex Lopez-Ortiz                             alopez-o@neumann.UWaterloo.ca
http://daisy.uwaterloo.ca/~alopez-o                     FAX (519)-885-1208
Department of Computer Science                      University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1                                           Canada



Any proceeds (net proceeds from merchandise sales) from TAFKAC solely benefit The Chuck Reed Fund.

Copyright Information

http://tafkac.org/